Leadership and the Symbolic Framework Assignment

Leadership and the Symbolic Framework - Assignment Example On the other side, when an ineffective leadership is considered, a symbolic leader is compared to a fanatic or a fool who leads through the use of smoke and mirror. This means, the symbolic leader, in this case, will be using false symbols that are ineffective in driving to effective leadership to the people. In an ineffective leadership situation, the leader is one that uses symbols in his leadership option but that only acts as a mirror since the leader does not emulate the symbols they suggest. In such a way, a symbolic leader becomes a leader who does not lead by example to make it ineffective. Symbolic leaders give organizations the view of being a theater or stage to play a given set of role so as to give impressions. Symbols are used by the leaders to catch attentions of the followers. Experiences are framed by the leaders organization by providing logical interpretations of the said experiences. As such, there is a vision that is discovered and is communicated by the leaders. As can be perceived very easily, transformational leadership style is one leadership style that imparts change into the organization. This kind of leadership style uses its characters and the traits of the leader to enforce change on the followers as well as on the organization. As can be seen from the above description of the symbolic framework, transformational leadership style closely parallels the framework. This can be seen from the way the symbolic framework is perceived to be inspirational.

Peer Review and credibility assessment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Peer Review and credibility assessment - Essay Example Generally, the paper is in perfect flow, while the writer sometimes disrupted the sequence. There is a need to utilize the similar writing style and font throughout the paper except main headings and subheading. The font as well as the writing style in the citation and paper is not the same that look informal. Spacing between the lines is not same in the whole paper. However, the format of the citation is correct and according to the APA writing standards. The introduction in the paper quite well introduces the paper and the content in the paper. The important factor of the introduction is the length of the introduction that makes it not only introducing the content but also discussing a bit of content. The writer quite well presented the facts in the introduction and clearly expressed the thesis statement that is â€Å"The value of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is best understood by examining its genesis and the events that prompted its creation, evaluating its mission to understand the department’s goals, and analyzing its effectiveness as measured by a variety of matrices.† The body of the paper is quite well distributed in paragraphs. Each point is well described in the writing; however, one paragraph has not adequate number of words that led to reduce the credibility of the point given in the paragraph. The points given in the paper have deep association with the thesis statement as each point tends to prove the statement. There is no unnecessary information given in the paper that is irrelevant to the topic. The content of the paper is well distributed in paragraphs. The title of the paper seems to be confusing and there is a need to write the notation of the words in the title of the paper. The writer employed his thought but supported then with proper citation. Books are considered as the most credible sources to be considered as a source for the writing. However, government sites and other renowned